Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts

Friday, January 30, 2009

Some links for the discussion on Tuesday


Some recent headlines

Where will it end?

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12903402

Turkish PM storms off in Gaza row

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/davos/7859417.stm

US Envoy Warns of Setbacks Ahead in Israel Gaza Peace Process

http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-01-30-voa27.cfm

Israel 'hides settlements data'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7861076.stm

EU envoy lays Gaza blame on Hamas

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7851545.stm

The Devastation of Gaza: From Factories to Ice Cream

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1874539,00.html

IAF strikes Gaza after IDF soldier killed near border

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1059156.html

A long and bumpy road


NY Times

The Bullets in My In-Box , by Ethan Bronner

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/weekinreview/25bronner.html?_r=1

Parsing Gains of Gaza War (also by Ethan Bronner)

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/world/middleeast/19assess.html?ref=world

Q. and A. With Taghreed El-Khodary in Gaza

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/q-a-with-taghreed-el-khodary-in-gaza/?ref=middleeast

Others

Chomsky's stance (and partial response to Bronner)

http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20090119.htm

Authors & Politics

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/jan/10/david-grossman-middle-east-conflict

BBC refuses to broadcast charity appeal for Gaza aid

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/01/25/bbc.gaza.advert/index.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/29/AR2009012903738.html?hpid=moreheadlines

Letter to Gaza Citizen: I Am the Soldier Who Slept in Your Home (Israel National News)

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/129674

Videos

Is Peace Out Of Reach?

Has peace in the Middle East become nothing more than a pipe dream? As Bob Simon reports, a growing number of Israelis and Palestinians feel that a two-state solution is no longer possible.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Religion against -- Logic, Science, Morality

Some more links, mostly talking about how religion inhibits moral and scientific progress (past and present). The 'Why I am Not a ...' articles below also talk about the origins of some specific religions (Christianity, Hinduism and Islam).

[1] An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish, by Bertrand Russell
This is an absolute classic, including Russell's other essays in 'Why I Am Not A Christian'

[2] The Genius of Charles Darwin, by Richard Dawkins (video)
This is a fairly new TV series on Channel 4 (UK) that mainly talks about Darwin and his ideas on evolution. The interesting parts come when Dawkins talks to various people about Darwin. So for instance, Dawkins goes into a school and asks 14-15 year old kids what they think of evolution: most, from all faiths apparently, say they think evolution is false because their holy books/church etc told them so. So Dawkins then takes them to some beach where they hunt for and find fossils. He explains geological time and how different fossils get to be in different layers etc and the kids can see them in front of their eyes. Despite even all that evidence, there are some who say that they would rather believe what their church told them than what they see with their own eyes and brains. Fascinating how religion not only provides no evidence, but it also teaches children to disbelieve any evidence that contradicts their faith. Some kids though slowly open up to the idea that maybe evolution is right.

[3] The Labeling of Children, by Richard Dawkins and Marcus Brigstocke (video)
Some of it funny, this 8-min video talks about the meaningless labeling of children as a Hindu child or a Christian child etc. And about how some of that could be considered child abuse. Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist and Marcus is a British comedian.

[4] Why I Am Not a Hindu, by Ramendra Nath
Tries the absolutely impossible task of defining a Hindu person, but using Gandhi's definitions and some history, argues why being a Hindu is both irrational and immoral. Its a good attempt, but I think the approach opens itself to several attacks, and also mixes up arguments about whether God exists with moral issues. I have not seen any modern atheist arguments against Hinduism that I would consider a classic.

[5] Why I Am Not a Muslim, by Ibn Warraq
This book is not available online, though several related articles by Ibn Warraq are available. Ibn Warraq is a pseudonym and his real name is not known publicly - that says quite a bit about freedom and Islam. He wrote his book after the Rushdie affair, which is another atrocious display of religious intolerance and bigotry. (That intolerance though is not unique to Islam, modern Hindutva fanatics are not a whole lot different in their tolerance of criticism). Ibn shows the Koran's texts to be man-made through historical and cultural references, and that of course, brings the whole deck of cards down for Islam. He also talks about how Islam blocks scientific and political progress through mis-education of children.

[6] Richard Dawkins on the biblical Abrahamic God (Old Testament), from his book The God Delusion
The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.
Says quite a bit about religion and the evolution of morality over the last 1400 years (since advent of Islam). Also see Elizabeth Anderson's If God is Dead, Is Everything Permitted? for more on morality in both the Old and New Testament.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Origin of religions

More links to what's put up under Secularism. (Mostly all evolutionary.)

[1] Evolution and Religion: Darwin's God. By Robin Henig in the NYT Magazine, on Scott Atran's research on a Darwinian approach to evolution of religions.

[2] Richard Dawkins' book The God Delusion:

[3] Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society, by David Sloan Wilson.
[4] An interesting discussion and analysis in the Gene Expression science blog.

[5] Richard Dawkins on TED Talks: An Atheist's call to arms

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Secularism

Hi all,

Last week, we decided to pick secularism as this week's topic. My question is:

What is the origin of various religions? What did they mean when they were formed? Have they changed – evolved/devolved over the period of time? Was various rituals part of the religion on day one? Does religion (and rituals) really mean anything in today’s world?

Here are few links:
Definition:

http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/religion/blrel_def.htm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A19645167

Origin and development:

http://www.allaboutreligion.org/origin-of-religion.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_origins_of_religion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_religion

http://www.acampbell.ukfsn.org/essays/skeptic/narrative.html

http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_theory1.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology_of_religion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_and_mythology

Religious Vs Non religious belief systems:

http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/religion/blrel_beliefs.htm


Pls read thru the various related pages on wiki...

More links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization

limited preview book:
http://books.google.com/books?id=evOZEWralVMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=cradle+of+civilization&sig=ACfU3U323ypZZ6a4YoQckzymyYzBjRTThQ#PPP1,M1

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Tuesday Open Mike 1: summary of the first meeting

Meeting was attended by 6 people. Logistics and possible topics were discussed. Broadly, this was what was decided:
  • We will create a blog to document the links and learnings of the various topic during this exercise. This blog will be new and separate from Austin's version of Open Mike (http://thursdayopenmike.blogspot.com).
  • We will join the same yahoogroups list as Austin's Open Mike group (thursdayopenmike@yahoogroups.com) [assuming Austin is okay with that].
  • We will continue to meet at Red Rock Cafe on Castro&Villa in Mountain View, every Tuesday evening at 7PM.
  • Some sample topics were suggested and Subbu to send out an email on the first of them later this week. The plan is for everyone to read and send out links ahead of time, so that we can discuss in a more informed and focused manner at the meeting. (More on topics later in this post.)
  • We would like to narrow down the specific question we are trying to answer or get an opinion on before the meeting itself, so that one (albeit small) issue is completely discussed and threshed out, while allowing for discussion to organically move on to other topics. This is to ensure that there is some focussed learning instead of random desultory conversations.
  • We would also like to have a way to review and see if our opinions and thoughts have changed, increased etc. from what they were about any topic prior to the discussion -- this is aimed at a way to track and see if the Open Mike is really working for each of us.
  • The Open Mike is definitely a non-Asha event, and is also definitely not restricted to any geographical region (like India) either in topic or in members.
  • All present to spread the word and invite everyone we know who might be interested in such an activity.
Apart from the above, we discussed possible topics and this is broadly what different folks came up with:
  • Gender bias/perspectives/stereotyping/spousal-abuse(either direction)/affirmative action along gender lines
  • Conservation -- energy/resources/environment
  • Secularism -- why hate? [addendum: Why religion?]
  • Is organic farming a good (economically viable) option for India?
  • Why nation boundaries? why demarcations?
  • Animal rights? why hunting? vegetarianism?

More clarity on topics will be developed as life goes on. For the next meeting, Subbu will formulate a question based on what he has suggested and send it out with a few links. For now, I've listed that topic as "Gender: bias or reverse bias?"